Black
Redstart (Phoenicurus ochruros) is a very common bird during winter, and
tends to flicker its tail a lot. They are just thrilled! Spotted this one in
the interior of Bharatpur Bird Sanctuary.
D.R.Bendre: Singing bird is throat
of the tree
‘Tis but a likeness of the Dream
Divine
Envisaged by the Peace of Buddha
when
It sat in penance on the Everest
Of Buddha’s Grief and glimpsed it
in the cave
Of contemplation deep; the only
blossom
That ever the tree of joy bore on
its blossom.
I
was at Dharwad and within the city is located DR Bendre National Trust next to
his home. The Trust also has a sort of a museum of Bendre that has collections
of pictures and lines from his poems. What put me off was indication of him
being ritual driven that too in the fag end of his life, it surely is not sign
of enlightened soul. I have read about Bendre sometime back and recall that he
carried the reputation of spiritually inclined and mystical in his expressions.
Influenced by Tagore and Aurobindo, as also Emerson so on I was looking forward
to know him better. But these references cautioned me.
Lines on Tagore…
With war of words we
are weary:
Our cheerless life was
dreary.
Master! You gave us
light
And songs of deep
delight.
Such grand, prophetic
utterances
And song of deep
deliverance
Are God’s gift to you.
Your peers there are
but few.
I
had bought a book The Spider and the Web
(GS Amur) –lots of typos (errors are crime). Two others book I went through
were DR Bendre: The Poet and Poetry (Kirtinath
Kurtkoti) and Bendre: Poet and Seer
(VK Gokak). The latter can be considered a definitive reference since Gokak had
over the years become, from a disciple to close friend and confidante (“Bendre
was a very near phenomenon to me”), further Gokak too like Bendre has been
awarded the highest literary award of the country: the Jnanpith. His writings are
lucid and gave insight into Bendre. I must add, most blogs take me about a
maximum of four days, in rare instance a week (travelling and taking pictures
of birds not included), but Bendre had me in deep quandary. I was troubled and
confused, on the one side he is compelling while on the other he seems to be
carrying the burden of tradition, indeed an enlightened soul would have seen
through it but Bendre seemed hopelessly enmeshed and increasingly intellectual
in his deal, but remarkably he does reflect universality and hint at
Upanishadic excellence. When Bendre saw Ganges he exclaims standing on bank “How
can ever one compose a song comprehending the river which Siva’s head could not
compose?” Gokak mentions this in
context to Bendre “overwhelmed with the sight of sublimity of nature”. I find
this quite confusing why sublimity of nature has to be through religious myths?
Why the river cannot be seen as a river? But then I realise Ganges hold on Hindus
and poet’s burden of ancient tradition, one need to add that through this he
does bring out overwhelming difficulty in putting words to wonders of nature. (I
guess you need to be too much entombed in temple squatter’s worldview to
understand these subtleties, which Gokak could, insignificant me cannot and
will not, liberal Karnad can. I am wondering what is common here!! I am also
wondering why Dalits or Tribes don’t find mention in Jnanpith award list. Some
narrations are difficult to plug in, that difficulty is also a choice!).
Dattatreya
Ramachandra Bendre (1896-1981) is one of the most prominent Kannada literary
figures and for many years was instrumental in determining the course of
history of Kannada literature. He wrote under the pen name Ambikatanayadatta,
and was arguably the foremost inheritor of great poetic traditions originating
with Pampa –the adikavi. Bendre was
in a way renaissance figure of sort in the resurgence of Kannada literature, ‘a
mix of passion of folk and sophistication of tradition’, he united the bhakti and gyana, lokik and alokik. He initiated many publications
and even started a group of literary friend (Geleyara Gampu, popularly Gampuians) that expanded to include young
talents, their intent being commune. VK Gokak was a student when he got
attracted to this group and maintained a
lifelong association. Here he narrates his first meeting with Bendre, he had
taken his poems for his reaction. Bendre
listened with patience, even approval. It was after giving me a full hearing
that he began to speak. The discourse lasted for more than three hours. Mrs
Bendre was impatient with long waiting since it was high time for dinner. But
Bendre’s imagination had soared, in his characteristic way, past the kitchen
right up to the stars. My soul was suspended in the web of his philosophic
talk. And when we rose to depart, I was a changed man. I feel my soul will
remember that talk long after it has ceased to be a denizen of earth.
Bendre
was driven by passion that found expression through religious symbolism and
deep insight into nature of things. His poems very immediately moves from
apparent to profound, the dexterity is breath taking, though my awareness is
based on translations but the commentaries by eminent scholars gives an insight
into ‘peculiar genius’ that was Bendre. For Bendre conflict between good and evil is a human conflict based on ethical
values but from divine point of view the problem of good and evil doesn’t exist.
The problem of being and non being, on the other hand can be solved on the
divine plane. There is Nietzsche here, this is where greatness of Indian
thoughts finds expressions. Bendre says “be a seeker then come forth with your
songs”.
In
one poem Shravana Monday he brings
out images that have metaphorical relation with each other. ‘The devotees
singing the praise of God, and caught in rhythmic pattern of their song, are
like the fish and koel, trying desperately trying to reach another order of
reality through faith which is instinctive and natural. Their sorrow is not
personal grief but existential anguish. What they have is simple faith which is
irrational, and they are simply waiting for the breaking up of the pattern so
that a new pattern of reality may emerge’. Some of Bendre’s poems are difficult
to comprehend and needs further study, the nuances takes time to reveal.
Poetry, according to Bendre, escapes or should escape the tyranny of meaning
which is commodity of market place. That culture which insists on verbal
meaning and is intolerant of any other value is decadent. In moments of
creative ecstasy, he finds words can only profane his meaning “These tremulous
strains hit beyond the heights and find the windpipe to be too small to pipe
them. How can I ever utter the words that the tongue can never reach?”
Something strange rose
On an unknown horizon
And crept into sight.
It took form as
creation
In the pupils of the
seeing eyes.
Words build the theatre
With emotions playing the
role
Of actor. They reach
The hearts of people
Giving them strength
and joy.
On each bough and each
Twig, a different kind
Of flower. The origin
is one
But the names are many.
You and I are the
source.
Names must name
something
To have the stamp of the real.
(Seeing and
Creating)
In another instance he mentions poetry as
place of violence in creative endeavour, violence here means ‘the power to destroy in order to purify’.
Purify? I haven’t really got that one!! He does however strive to show the need
for objectivity in art. “Leave my suffering and my delights to me. But I will
give you the poetry of my pain, the melody of my mirth. And if your heart melts
at the strains like sugar-crystals, will you not permit me to taste its
sweetness?” That surely is quite a charming take.
Some
of his poems translated from Kannada…
The
Evening
The face of the sky was
bitten pink by the queen of colours,
Then it was evening.
Near the edge of land,
the cloak of mist had fallen
carelessly, And was now
and then rising with the wind.
The quarter moon, like
a chogachi flower, ha slowly
opened. There was
silver above.
The stars like jasmine
flowers
Were scattered in the
hair of the night.
The round, big eyed
girl with a big belly
Was returning home with
her pot of water.
The path to the well,
like a small kitten
Was following her,
tangling her feet and falling behind.
The cool rain wind was stealthily
playing with her saree
And out of fear, often,
would let it go.
A parrot from a heart
was following in the shadow,
And was unaware of what
it was doing.
This
poem The Bird of Time has become my
favourite…
The
Bird of Time
The Bird of Time is
winging, winging.
Above, around, below,
By leagues and leagues,
with leaps and bounds,
In the twinkle of an
eye,
The Bird of Time is
winging.
Dark and grey are its
tailward ends,
Bright and flashing,
feather on feather
Ruby, gold and colour
on colour
Beat its wings on
either side.
The Bird of Time is
winging.
Its body is of rain
burdened sapphire clouds,
As if the skies had
taken wings.
Hooded with a diadem of
stars,
The very sun and moon
are its eyes.
The Bird of Time is
winging.
Threshing thrones like
ears of corn,
It makes a meal of
empires, princedoms.
The mainlands drift and
continents succumb
As it pecks at the world’s
imperial crowns.
The Bird of Time is
winging.
Dusting the writ
forehead of ages past
And opening fated eras
wide,
It brings to birth with
its flaps of wings
The children of a new
seed time.
The Bird of Time is
winging.
Flying past Venus as by
a village
And past Mars, sucking
him dry,
It soars and sings in
the very courtyards
Of benignant Mercury.
The Bird of Time is
winging.
It touches the fringe
of the very quarters
And stretches its beak
beyond their line
To hatch or hew its
egged universes:
Who can know its dark
intent?
The Bird of Time is
winging.
The
butterfly
The wings of a
butterfly,
Have you seen them,
sister?
Poked with beautiful
green spots,
Smeared with turmeric;
Bathed in pure gold,
With silver rice
scattered all over;
A circle of vermilion
Running round a
brilliant spot;
Its wings are of the
cream of the wind
Not one, but so many,
Who made them all?
What colours!
Suggesting the bright
feathers of a peacock!
Nicer than silk are the
delicate wings,
So nice, I am afraid to
touch.
…
They dance all day to a
mad tune,
And fly away, with the
wind.
Fly away –wither?
Perhaps to the
enchanting gardens of paradise.
The
Sunflower
What haughtiness! What
audacity!
It stares into our
eyes.
It drinks the liquid
heat of the eye
Of the sky and creates
Thirst for light. Look
how the sunflower
Stands! Like the world
illuminating
Sight of the Girnar top or Kailasa summit,
Like a lion with
pericarp face
And petal mane, looking
imperiously
And saying; this is
divine
Initiation. Like the meru pillar
In the flower it stands
The heart always looks
up
When it aspires for the
great.
Wise
saying
Lines of friendship on
the foreheads of parrots.
Different forests,
different houses
Different kinds,
different sounds.
When they see wings
They come together
And claim friendship
They take to wing
suddenly
And suddenly they
descend.
They spend their days
where they can
Would I ever see such
people?
In
the last days of his life he was immersed in numbers, numerology. No doubt
Bendre was a compelling poet but I am sorry these interests cannot be
supported. Numerology is absolute nonsense and occupies attention of wasted
mind. These mumbo jumbos have become quite popular these days, only reflecting
resurgence of market supported nonsense feeding on insecurities of people,
there is a feverish race to reach the lowest denominator. Numbers are facts, a
convenient representation for calculation, there is nothing sacred here (even
Ramanujam’s number is explanation of fact that his brilliant mind was able to
conceive). And therefore there is nothing to intuit knowledge into it; Bendre
even attempts A Theory of Immortality
through numbers!! I reckon when one is immersed in traditional way of things,
while social reality of discrimination is conveniently bypassed, these superior
bearings find outlet in these speculations, this too is ancient tradition. Bendre
just lost it, nothing much. But then in Indian traditions these are
philosophical speculations, they are quite adept in fitting these craps into
narrations of greatness.
I
was reading The Open Eyes –A Journey
through Karnataka by Dom Moraes (some brilliant illustration by Mario
Miranda). There is a passage on his meeting with Bendre, quite hilarious one
that. Dr Bendre is a small, bespectacled
man, frail, but, despite his years, incurably active and incurably talkative.
As soon as we arrived, he deposited me in a chair and pointed triumphantly at a
blackboard. ‘19’, he said, ‘is your number. Look. It is also mine.’ Chalked on
the blackboard was a series of dates, the first of which was 1919, ‘That’, he
said, ‘was the year of my marriage.’ The next date was 1938….and 57 is 19
multiplied by three.’ The date under this was 1976. ‘In this year we met,’ he
said triumphantly. ‘And 76 is 19 multiplied by four.’
He therefore clearly
supposed our meeting to be one of the most important points in my life. The
next date was 1995. ‘This,’ said Dr Bendre, ‘is multiplied by five, and this
will be the acme of your career.’ By this time I was feeling extremely bemused.
‘I come from an old Vedic family,’ said Dr Bendre, ‘and for 60 years have
pursued the science of numerology.’ He added, ‘Apart from the number 19, I was
born with number four. That is why the English translation of my poems is
called Four Strings.’ He pointed to German isotope chart on his wall. ‘The
letter C,’ he told me ‘is 6. The letter N is really 7. The letter O is 8. O is
nonsense: 8 is sense. C is nonsense. 6 is sense. 7 is sense. Nitrogen is
nonsense.’ I sat and looked at him in utter incomprehension, nodding my head
politely from time to time. He asked me if I understood him.
Since, had I said I did
not understand him, I would have perpetuated another waterfall of words, I said
I did. He then took me around his library, which is immense. There are
thousands of books stacked in wooden shelves: books in all languages. While we
inspected them he told me, ‘Pythagoras said 50 minus is 3 square + 4 square,
and this makes 5 square. Three squared is the child, five squared is woman: 25
is man.’ I said ‘Ah.’ Dr Bendre continued, ‘We are in Milky Way. The truth of
the seasons is not in the solar but in the polar centre. We have to shift our
minds to the Pole star which has 28,000 cycles. It is in front of my house
sometimes. I know it is there; I know I am here. Men may come and men may go.’
I said ‘Ah’, once more…
Though I had had little
opportunity to read his poems, apart from the small English translation…I no
longer had any doubt that he was a great poet. Only great poets have such
interests and ideas as Dr Bendre has.
And
that, I believe, is sarcasm not a compliment.
I
have been confused about Bendre, clearly our man ‘from an old Vedic family’
just couldn’t come out of his little mesh, despite grandness of his poems, it
is the arrogance and legacy of surety of one’s place, as prescribed and
entitled by his tradition, that led him to the path of ‘numerological’
degradation. Some writers point that these need to be further studied!! Sure in
the meanwhile I did some check, Bendre and Moraes died in the year and date
that has nothing to do with number 19, well I guess nothing can be more
important than death in a person’s life!! The tragedy is India has tradition of
tolerating nonsense and they tend to intellectualise these with inputs from
science, and then create some kind of philosophy few centuries later it becomes
tradition. It doesn’t even stand basic scrutiny but still they cling on to it. Few
cursory flips will tell that most of Vedas are crap; it is Upanishad that
touches the subtle. Great people like Buddha, Kabir, Guru Nanak…saints and
seers could see this, they weren’t part of any miracle nor claimed any entitlement.
Gokak assertion of Bendre being a seer is questioned on this very ground.
Simple
living is no big deal, it can be a habit. It is the mind that needs be
sophisticatedly simple, effortlessly connects to realities of surroundings,
hence compassion, hence creativity. There is no claim to grandness here. I was
confused about Bendre, now I know the reason.
From
my scribble pad…
Morning
Mandala
The eastern clouds assumes pattern
of its choice
A pause.
A meditative silence.
Little hues of orange, some
tentative red, lots of golden yellow
is slid in photon by photon onto
the blue canvas.
It grows in splendour
Builds up gilded palaces and
choicest conceptions
magnificent citadels of
imaginations
and perfecting ideas.
The blinding brightness of
realisation.
An invisible hand wipes away
the moment’s glory
in a snap restores the fragile
back into the frame.